Segmentation by type classifies Vitrification Media into open‑system and closed‑system formats, each further divided into functional sub‑categories. Open‑system media rely on direct contact between the sample and the cryoprotectant solution; within this group, cryoprotectant‑based formulations (e.g., dimethyl sulfoxide, ethylene glycol) dominate, offering high permeability but raising contamination concerns. Synthetic polymer‑based media—such as polyethylene glycol blends—provide reduced toxicity and improved post‑thaw viability, targeting premium‑price niches. Closed‑system media encapsulate the specimen within sealed devices, eliminating exposure risk; their sub‑types include combination formulations, which integrate low‑toxicity cryoprotectants with polymers to balance permeability and safety, and carrier‑free solutions designed for minimal residue. The market value of each type correlates with regulatory preferences and end‑user risk tolerance: open‑system media capture roughly 55 % of sales due to legacy adoption, while closed‑system solutions, valued at 45 %, are gaining traction as sterility standards tighten across applications.