Segmentation by type distinguishes pumps based on construction and control architecture, primarily into disposable versus reusable units, and motor‑driven versus spring‑driven mechanisms. Disposable pumps—typically low‑cost, single‑use devices—capture a modest share of the market, appealing to high‑turnover clinics that prioritize infection control over long‑term capital outlay. Reusable pumps, representing the bulk of sales, justify higher upfront investment through durability, advanced programmable interfaces, and service contracts, thus expanding total addressable market value. Within reusable models, motor‑driven pumps dominate due to superior precision, variable flow‑rate capability, and integration with electronic medical records, while spring‑driven pumps serve niche segments requiring battery‑free operation in field or emergency contexts. These type distinctions affect overall market size by influencing unit price, lifecycle cost, and adoption barriers, informing manufacturers' portfolio strategies and end‑user purchasing decisions.