Segmentation by type classifies Support Surfaces into foam, gel, air‑filled, hybrid, and alternating‑pressure systems, each addressing distinct clinical needs. Foam surfaces, the most cost‑effective option, dominate the low‑to‑mid price tier and capture approximately 40 % of market volume, driven by widespread use in both acute and chronic settings. Gel‑infused products, offering superior heat dispersion, account for roughly 15 % of sales, primarily in high‑risk pressure‑injury wards. Air‑filled and alternating‑pressure mattresses together represent about 30 % of the market, valued for their dynamic redistribution of pressure in intensive care and long‑term care environments. Hybrid models, combining foam cores with air or gel layers, hold the remaining 15 % share, appealing to facilities seeking a balance of comfort, durability, and therapeutic performance. This type‑based taxonomy informs R&D investment, supply‑chain complexity, and competitive positioning within the overall market.