Segmentation by Types differentiates the market into flexible, rigid, and capsule‑based single‑use video endoscopes, each addressing distinct procedural requirements. The flexible category dominates, capturing approximately 65% of the market, due to its adaptability across urological, gastrointestinal, and pulmonology procedures where navigation through tortuous anatomy is essential. The rigid variant accounts for roughly 25%, favored in otolaryngology and orthopedic arthroscopy where high‑resolution imaging and robust maneuverability are needed for confined operative fields. The emerging capsule endoscope, representing about 10%, is limited to specialized gastrointestinal diagnostics but is gaining traction because of its minimally invasive deployment and elimination of reprocessing altogether. Revenue distribution mirrors these usage patterns, with flexible devices generating the bulk of earnings owing to higher unit prices and broader clinical adoption, while rigid scopes contribute a steady share linked to procedural specificity, and capsule systems, though niche, indicate a growth trajectory as technology matures.