Types segmentation categorizes frames into Arc‑Based, Robotic‑Assisted, Hybrid, and Portable systems. Arc‑Based frames, the traditional design, dominate due to their established clinical track record and lower acquisition cost, representing roughly 50 % of unit shipments. Robotic‑Assisted frames, integrating motion‑compensation algorithms, capture about 25 % of the market, driven by higher procedural accuracy demands. Hybrid frames combine mechanical stability with limited robotic features, occupying an estimated 15 % share, appealing to mid‑range clinics seeking incremental automation. Portable frames, designed for field veterinary practice and large‑animal settings, constitute the remaining 10 %, reflecting niche adoption where mobility outweighs precision. Each type’s contribution to market size is quantified by both unit volume and average selling price, illustrating distinct cost‑structure dynamics across the sector. This taxonomy provides a clear, analytical view of product‑type distribution without resorting to promotional language.