The Types segment of Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) Systems taxonomy distinguishes devices by power source, lead configuration, and stimulation waveform. Rechargeable systems, offering extended device longevity, now capture around 60 % of unit sales, driven by patient preference for fewer replacements. Non‑rechargeable units retain a 40 % share, primarily in cost‑sensitive markets. Lead architecture splits into percutaneous leads, favored for minimally invasive implantation and representing 55 % of procedures, and paddle leads, which, despite a more invasive placement, command 45 % due to superior targeting of dorsal column fibers. Waveform differentiation includes conventional low‑frequency (40–60 Hz) devices, still prevalent at 50 % of implants, high‑frequency (>1 kHz) systems at 30 % reflecting emerging clinical data, and burst stimulation at 20 % as clinicians seek paresthesia‑free options. Each type’s market contribution reflects a balance of clinical outcomes, device cost, and reimbursement environments, informing strategic positioning for manufacturers.