Segmentation by type classifies Snare Devices into Mechanical, Electromechanical, and Hybrid categories, each with distinct sub‑variants that affect market dynamics. Mechanical snares—including rotating, lasso, and basket designs—dominate the price‑sensitive segments, contributing roughly 45% of total sales due to their simplicity and broad procedural compatibility. Electromechanical snares, equipped with integrated cutting or coagulation capabilities, capture about 35% of the market, driven by hospitals seeking procedural efficiency and reduced instrument exchanges. The Hybrid class, merging mechanical capture with electronic feedback (e.g., force‑sensing or imaging‑integrated snares), holds the remaining 20%, appealing to high‑volume specialty centers that prioritize precision and data capture for outcome analytics. This type‑based taxonomy clarifies how functional differentiation and technology adoption rates translate into distinct revenue streams within the broader Snare Devices market.