Segmentation by type classifies Permanent Antistatic Masterbatch into three principal categories, each with polymer‑specific subtypes that influence formulation complexity and cost structure. The first category, conductive masterbatch, contains carbon‑based or metal‑oxide fillers that achieve surface resistivity below 10⁶ Ω/sq, suitable for high‑performance antistatic requirements. Sub‑variants are tailored for polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP), and polyvinyl chloride (PVC), reflecting the need for compatibility with distinct melt viscosities. The second category, antistatic (non‑conductive) masterbatch, relies on surfactant‑type additives to maintain surface resistivity in the 10⁶‑10⁹ Ω/sq range, offering a balance between static control and material transparency. Its subtypes include PE‑grade, PP‑grade, and engineering‑plastic grades such as ABS and PA. The third category, low‑voltage conductive masterbatch, incorporates fine‑tuned conductive networks that enable voltage‑controlled dissipation for applications like ESD flooring. Sub‑types follow the same polymer‑specific schema, ensuring optimal dispersion and mechanical integrity. The relative market share of each type is dictated by the prevalence of the corresponding applications outlined in the application segmentation.