Segmentation by type further refines the market taxonomy, separating elastics according to material composition and performance characteristics. Latex‑based elastics, valued for high elasticity and low cost, dominate the segment with an estimated 60 % share, though they are limited by allergenic concerns. Silicone‑based elastics offer superior biocompatibility and stable force decay, capturing about 25 % of the market despite a higher price point. Polyurethane elastics, noted for durability and consistent force delivery, occupy roughly 10 % of sales, primarily in specialized orthodontic protocols. A residual composite‑material category, integrating hybrid polymers for niche applications, contributes the remaining 5 %. This type‑based breakdown clarifies how material selection, driven by clinical requirements and patient sensitivities, shapes the distribution of revenue within the Oral Elastics market.