Types classification distinguishes the product line by design and material attributes, each influencing overall market valuation. The standard‑length disposable cannula, manufactured from soft silicone, dominates due to its low cost and ease of replacement, capturing roughly 60 % of type‑related revenue. Extended‑length variants address anatomical variability in larger neonates and are priced higher, contributing about 15 % of sales. Low‑flow (≤2 L min⁻¹) devices are preferred for gentle oxygen delivery, while high‑flow (2‑8 L min⁻¹) models support more aggressive ventilation strategies; together they represent 20 % of the type mix, reflecting clinical protocol diversification. Finally, a niche reusable stainless‑steel frame option, marketed for cost‑sensitive institutions, accounts for the remaining 5 % of the market. The distribution of these sub‑types aligns with hospital procurement policies, patient‑specific flow requirements, and cost‑effectiveness analyses, forming a coherent market taxonomy for the Neonatal Dual Port Nasal Cannula sector.