The Types segment classifies forks by mechanical architecture: Rigid, Air‑spring, Coil‑spring, and Adjustable‑travel designs. Rigid forks, lacking suspension, serve a niche of lightweight cross‑country and commuter bikes, contributing a modest share of the market due to limited demand for vibration damping. Air‑spring forks dominate the segment, accounting for the majority of volume because they offer tunable pressure, lower weight, and scalability across travel ranges, making them suitable for Trail, Enduro, and Downhill applications. Coil‑spring forks, though heavier, retain relevance in high‑impact disciplines such as Downhill where consistent damping is critical, representing a smaller but stable portion of sales. Adjustable‑travel forks, which allow riders to modify travel without replacing the fork, are emerging in the premium segment, adding incremental growth potential. Together, these market taxonomy types explain the distribution of manufacturing focus and price points within the overall Mountain Bike Fork market.