Segmentation by type classifies Mesocarbon Microbeads according to morphology, purity level, and surface treatment, each attribute influencing cell performance and pricing structure. Spherical microbeads dominate the market, representing roughly 55 % of production, because their uniform geometry minimizes internal resistance and supports high tap density, which is critical for EV and ESS cells. Irregular‑shaped beads account for about 20 %, favored in applications where rapid lithium intercalation is prioritized over volumetric efficiency, such as power‑tool batteries. High‑purity (≥99.5 % carbon) grades make up 15 % of the mix; their low impurity content reduces side‑reaction risk, extending cycle life for premium consumer‑electronics devices. Low‑purity (≈98 %) variants occupy the remaining 10 %, offering a cost‑effective option for mass‑market electronics where price sensitivity outweighs marginal performance gains. Emerging coated and hybrid microbeads, which combine conductive additives or polymer shells, are still under 5 % but are projected to grow at double‑digit rates as manufacturers seek tailored electrode interfaces. The relative share of each type directly translates into revenue distribution, with spherical high‑purity beads commanding the highest average price per kilogram.