In the types dimension of Medium FOV Dental Extraoral CBCT segmentation, the market is split between rotating‑gantry systems and fixed‑arc (or cone‑beam) units, each presenting distinct technical and operational profiles. Rotating‑gantry devices, comprising approximately 60 % of installations, deliver superior spatial resolution and flexible patient positioning, which is essential for complex surgical planning and multi‑angle reconstructions. Fixed‑arc systems, making up the remaining 40 %, are valued for their compact footprint, faster acquisition times, and lower capital outlay, making them attractive for high‑throughput general dentistry clinics. Within these broad categories, sub‑types such as single‑detector versus dual‑detector configurations further refine performance metrics like dose efficiency and image clarity. The relative prevalence of each type directly influences the market’s aggregate size, as procurement budgets, maintenance contracts, and ancillary software licensing are calibrated to the specific capabilities and cost structures of the chosen technology.