Curettes segmentation follows a comparable two‑axis framework. Application mirrors the scaler distribution, allocating 55 % to periodontal scaling, 30 % to implant surface debridement, and 15 % to surgical curettage, thereby shaping the total market envelope. Within the type axis, curettes are classified as Gracey, universal, and area‑specific (e.g., root‑surface) instruments. Gracey curettes, engineered with angulated blades for selective root‑surface access, dominate the segment (≈ 50 %) because they reduce clinician fatigue and improve precision in deep pockets. Universal curettes, adaptable across tooth surfaces, hold ≈ 35 % and serve general‑practice settings. Area‑specific curettes, designed for narrow or furcation sites, account for the remaining ≈ 15 % and are essential in complex periodontal surgery. The interaction of application‑level demand with type‑level functionality determines the aggregate Curettes market size, reinforcing the importance of a granular market taxonomy for strategic planning.