Segmentation by Types distinguishes active (powered) versus passive (mechanical) architectures, and further classifies devices as lowerโbody, upperโbody, or fullโbody solutions. Active exoskeletons, comprising integrated motors and control systems, capture the higherโmargin segment of the market, primarily serving highโload tasks in manufacturing and construction where force amplification exceeds 30โฏkg. Passive devices, relying on springs, counterโweights, or ergonomic frames, dominate the lowerโcost tier, appealing to logistics and warehousing operators who seek fatigue mitigation without energy consumption. Within each architecture, lowerโbody units (e.g., lumbar support, kneeโassist) constitute roughly 55โฏ% of typeโbased sales, reflecting the prevalence of lifting and squatting motions across sectors. Upperโbody models (shoulderโassist, armโsupport) hold ~30โฏ%, driven by overhead assembly and toolโhandling requirements. Fullโbody systems, integrating both domains, represent the remaining ~15โฏ%, targeting specialized tasks such as shipyard welding or heavy equipment maintenance. This taxonomy clarifies how functional differentiation aligns with applicationโspecific ROI calculations and informs manufacturers' portfolio strategies.