Segmentation by type classifies Immune Cell Therapy Drugs into autologous, allogeneic, and gene‑edited modalities, each with distinct manufacturing and commercialization implications. Autologous therapies, comprising roughly 45 % of the market, involve patient‑derived cells reprogrammed ex vivo, offering personalized efficacy but incurring high logistic costs and limited scalability. Allogeneic products, now capturing about 35 % of sales, use donor‑derived cells engineered for universal compatibility, enabling off‑the‑shelf availability and economies of scale, albeit with heightened immunogenicity risk. Gene‑edited approaches—encompassing CRISPR‑modified CAR‑T, TCR‑T, and NK‑cell candidates—represent the remaining 20 %, driven by advances that enhance persistence, specificity, and safety profiles. Within these categories, sub‑types such as CAR‑T, TCR‑engineered T‑cells, and NK‑cell platforms exhibit varied adoption rates, reflecting disease‑target suitability and regulatory pathways. Understanding this taxonomy is essential for forecasting pipeline dynamics and allocating capital across the divergent development trajectories.