Types segmentation separates pharmacologic and non‑pharmacologic modalities, each further divided into sub‑categories that shape development pipelines and pricing structures. Pharmacologic treatments, which generate approximately 70 % of market value, are split between stimulants (e.g., modafinil, armodafinil) that enhance catecholamine activity, wake‑promoting agents (e.g., pitolisant, solriamfetol) that target histaminergic or dopamine pathways, and GABAergic modulators (e.g., sodium oxybate) that modulate sleep architecture. Within these subtypes, pricing variance and patent life dictate revenue concentration, with stimulants historically dominating generic competition while newer agents command premium pricing. Non‑pharmacologic options—accounting for the remaining 30 %—include behavioral therapy (structured sleep‑wake scheduling), scheduled napping protocols, and light‑therapy interventions. Although lower in unit cost, these approaches contribute to market size through ancillary services, device sales, and reimbursement for multidisciplinary care. The delineation of types clarifies resource allocation across R&D, manufacturing, and clinical practice, reinforcing the overall market taxonomy for Idiopathic Hypersomnia Treatment.