Types segmentation distinguishes the material architecture of Dural Repair Gel products. Synthetic polymer‑based gels, primarily composed of polyethylene glycol (PEG) or polyurethane networks, dominate with roughly 55 % of sales, owing to their tunable mechanical properties, rapid cross‑linking, and consistent batch‑to‑batch performance. Collagen‑derived gels capture about 25 % of the market; they leverage native extracellular matrix cues to promote fibroblast infiltration and natural healing, but exhibit higher variability and cost. Fibrin‑based formulations hold a 15 % share, valued for intrinsic hemostatic activity and biodegradability, yet limited by shorter residence time and stricter storage requirements. The remaining 5 % comprises hybrid systems that combine synthetic backbones with biologic additives, targeting niche indications where both strength and bioactivity are critical. Each type contributes to the overall market size by aligning with specific surgical preferences, reimbursement frameworks, and regulatory classifications. The prevalence of synthetic polymer gels drives R&D investment, while the biologic segments sustain niche growth, illustrating the nuanced market taxonomy within Dural Repair Gel types.