Segmentation by type categorizes Dual Basin Automated Endoscope Reprocessors into three functional architectures: fully‑automated, semi‑automated, and modular systems. Fully‑automated units, representing roughly 58 % of installed base, integrate loading, cleaning, disinfection, and drying cycles without operator intervention, thereby commanding premium pricing and higher margin contributions. Semi‑automated models, accounting for about 27 % of the market, require manual loading or unloading steps but retain automated fluid management, offering a cost‑effective alternative for mid‑size facilities. Modular configurations, which comprise the remaining 15 %, allow hospitals to customize basin capacity and add‑on accessories such as advanced tracking or remote monitoring, appealing to institutions with variable throughput demands. The relative market share of each type reflects capital expenditure constraints, workflow complexity, and regulatory compliance pressures. As hospitals prioritize throughput efficiency and traceability, the fully‑automated segment continues to drive growth, while semi‑automated and modular offerings sustain niche adoption across diverse clinical environments.