Segmentation by type categorizes extraction technologies into manual kits, automated platforms, magnetic‑bead based systems, column‑based formats, and organic‑solvent methods. Manual kits remain significant (≈35 %) due to low capital outlay and suitability for small‑scale labs, though they incur higher labor costs. Automated platforms capture about 28 % as large clinical and industrial users seek throughput, reproducibility, and reduced contamination risk, driving premium pricing. Magnetic‑bead technologies, representing 20 %, bridge manual and automated realms by offering scalability and compatibility with robotic handlers. Column‑based systems hold 10 %, favored for their simplicity and consistent performance in mid‑range workloads. Organic‑solvent approaches, at roughly 7 %, persist in niche research settings where high purity is paramount despite safety and waste‑management concerns. The relative weight of each type reflects investment capacity, workflow integration, and performance requirements, directly affecting total market valuation.