Segmentation by types classifies brackets into metal, ceramic, polymer, lingual, and self‑ligating families, each with distinct sub‑categories that affect pricing and adoption curves. Metal brackets are split into stainless‑steel and nickel‑titanium variants; stainless‑steel dominates due to cost efficiency, while nickel‑titanium offers superior flexibility for initial alignment phases. Ceramic brackets include monocrystalline and polycrystalline forms, prized for translucency but limited by higher fracture risk, positioning them in the premium segment. Polymer brackets encompass polycarbonate and hybrid composites, targeting patients with metal sensitivities and contributing to niche market growth. Lingual brackets are custom‑milled for the tooth’s interior surface, representing a specialized, high‑value niche with slower adoption due to technical complexity. Self‑ligating brackets are further divided into active and passive clip systems, reducing chair‑time and enhancing patient comfort, thereby capturing a growing share of the orthodontic segment. This taxonomy clarifies how each type’s functional attributes and cost structures shape overall market dynamics.