The Types dimension classifies anti‑inflammatory actives into four sub‑categories: botanical extracts, synthetic peptides, mineral compounds, and fermented actives. Botanical extracts—such as green‑tea catechins, licorice‑derived glabridin, and chamomile flavonoids—represent the largest share (≈ 40 %) because they are widely accepted by regulators and consumers, and they provide multi‑functional benefits that justify higher price points. Synthetic peptides, exemplified by palmitoyl tripeptide‑5 and acetyl hexapeptide‑8, account for roughly 30 % of the market; their targeted mechanism of action enables lower effective concentrations, which drives formulation efficiency despite higher synthesis costs. Mineral compounds, including zinc oxide, niacinamide, and calcium‑based buffers, contribute about 20 % and are valued for their stability and compatibility with a broad range of cosmetic bases. Fermented actives—derived from bio‑processed soy, rice, or yeast—hold the remaining 10 %, reflecting emerging interest in microbiome‑friendly ingredients that can modulate inflammatory pathways. This market taxonomy clarifies how each type underpins total market volume and informs R&D prioritisation. Cost‑benefit analysis indicates that botanical extracts drive the majority of revenue, while synthetic peptides generate higher margin per unit due to premium positioning.