Segmentation by type distinguishes CCR catalysts according to their chemical composition and regeneration mechanism, each with sub‑categories that shape market dynamics. Zeolite‑based catalysts (e.g., Y‑type, USY) dominate the FCC segment owing to their superior acidity and thermal stability, commanding the bulk of spend within that application. Metal‑oxide catalysts (e.g., Ni‑Mo, Co‑Mo) are prevalent in Hydrocracking, where hydrogenation activity complements regeneration cycles. Hybrid catalysts combine zeolitic frameworks with metal oxides to address reforming requirements, offering balanced cracking and dehydrogenation functions. The cost structure, performance longevity, and regulatory compliance associated with each subtype dictate their proportional contribution to the total CCR catalyst market, with zeolite‑based variants typically representing the highest revenue share due to broader adoption and higher unit pricing.