Segmentation by types of cell sorting technologies isolates three dominant modalities and their sub‑technologies, each influencing market dynamics through distinct performance attributes. Fluorescence‑activated cell sorting (FACS), the most mature platform, includes subtypes such as traditional droplet‑based FACS, high‑speed jet‑in‑air sorters, and next‑generation spectral‑FACS, together commanding roughly 55% of equipment sales due to their multiplexing capability and quantitative precision. Magnetic‑activated cell sorting (MACS) comprises column‑based, automated magnetic‑bead, and micro‑magnet arrays, collectively holding about 30% of the market; its appeal lies in simplicity, lower capital outlay, and suitability for large‑volume, low‑purity workflows. Microfluidic‑based sorting—including deterministic lateral displacement, inertial focusing, and droplet‑based microfluidic sorters—captures the remaining 15%, driven by emerging applications that require gentle handling of fragile cells and integration with lab‑on‑a‑chip systems. The relative share of each type reflects the trade‑off between throughput, resolution, and operational cost that end‑users prioritize across different research and production settings.